Book Review: Delighting in the Trinity

Delighting in the Trinity: An Introduction to the Christian Faith An Introduction to the Christian Faith by Michael Reeves

I know my Trinitarian formulations back and forth—I’ve even made a quiz on it—and I get a geeky thrill thinking about how to accurately express truths about God as Trinity. It’s the same sort of rush I used to get from solving long algebra equations. It is important to get our trinitarian formulations right, but the Trinity is so much more than formulations. According to Mike Reeves, the Trinity is what makes God delightful; it’s what makes him good and loving and desirable. 

Delighting in the Trinity consists of five chapters, each showing how the Trinity makes our God more beautiful than a single person God would be. The God who is Trinity is considered as he exists in eternity, in his work in creation, in his work in salvation, and as he works in the life of the believer. Then, in the last chapter, Reeves considers what he calls the “words we use to describe God,” specifically examining God’s holiness, wrath, and glory and how the triune being of God “brightens and defines them.” (The links in the paragraph above lead to previously posted excerpts from the chapter described.)

Previously posted quotes from Delighting in the Trinity:

When Father Is a Bad Thing

Always Being Together….

If God Were Single

God’s Wrath Is Proof….

Michael Reeves’ passion for the doctrine of the Trinity comes through on every page of this book, so it is a joy to read. It’s obvious that for him, the doctrine of the Trinity is not dry, irrelevant, or embarrassing, but the central truth of Christianity, “the truth that shapes and beautifies all others.” His enthusiasm is contagious; if you read Delighting in the Trinity and it doesn’t make you more passionate about the Trinity, you might be dead.

This is a short book, conversationally written, so I can recommend it for almost any Christian. Reeves doesn’t assume that the reader has a background in Trinitarian theology, so it is an excellent choice for a student or new believer. And his passion for the subject makes it a good choice even for those who consider themselves well-studied in the faith. None of us are beyond more delight in the Trinity.

Michael Reeves is currently theological adviser for the Universities and Colleges Christian Fellowship (UCCF) in the United Kingdom. He oversees Theology Network, a resource I  use frequently for Theological Terms posts.

I have two small peeves: the humour—it was mostly fun, but sometimes a bit annoying; and the structure—the text occasionally seemed disorganized. I have a hunch both of these things are there because the book is written with students in mind, so I wouldn’t ask that anything be changed. I mention them only to warn other uptight sourpusses not to be put off by them. Keep reading; you’ll be glad you did.

---

[I also liked Mike Reeve’s YouTube videos on the Trinity (Trinity Media). Watch them and let them convince you to read this book.]

Book Review: Pierced for Our Transgressions

Click on image to purchase at Amazon.com

Rediscovering the Glory of Penal Substitution by Steve Jeffery, Michael Ovey, Andrew Sach.

The sermon that changed my life was one explaining the doctrine of penal substitution.1 I was a little girl, listening to words and seeing the face of Jesus on the cross, dying in my place, suffering the wrath of God that should have been mine on account of my own sin. This is the picture that captured my heart and turned me into a Christian.

That Christ’s death on the cross was a penal substitutionary atonement might be the most precious truth I know. When this doctrine is mocked, belittled, or questioned, it breaks my heart; first, for Jesus’ honor, stolen from him; and second, for the one who scoffs or doubts. What must it be to not see glory in Christ’s penal subsitutionary death on the cross?

It was in Bible college that I first knew someone who claimed to be a believer but challenged the doctrine of penal substitution. Then, I saw it as honest questioning, a quest to find the real truth of the cross taught in the Bible. Looking back, I’m more cynical; I see the objections as disguised distaste for God’s truth. Later, in my Christian discussion board days, I saw young men join up with one purpose: to open threads titled “Jesus Did Not PAY for Your Sin!!!!” (or something similar) so they could argue/rail against a penal substitutionary atonement. Right now, I know people who have read books by doubting troublemakers and are confused, questioning, and maybe even rebelling against this doctrine.

Previously posted quotes from Pierced for Our Transgressions:

Our Passover Lamb

The Servant’s Suffering Was Substitutional

Substitution and Participation

Trading Down

Safeguarding God’s Simplicity

A Real Union, Not a Legal Fiction

Looking for God’s Love

Why Do Believers Still Suffer and Die?

What Wondrous Love Is This!

Penal Substitution = Universal Salvation?

Among the books I am reading, there is almost always one on Christ’s death, first, because it’s a subject I love, but also because I want to be able to explain and defend it as all that it is. I want to be able to make a better case now than I did back in Bible college and on the discussion boards, so when Pierced for Our Transgressions came out a few years ago, I bought it and started to read. But it’s the kind of book that takes determined focus and I had to set it aside. This spring I took it up again.

This book is divided into two parts. The first “sets out the positive case for penal substitution,” showing us the biblical evidence for it, the theological framework undergirding it, its pastoral importance, and its place in church history. Explaining the theological framework is especially significant, I think, because objections to penal substitution are often not primarily scriptural, historical, or even pastoral, but theological (like the legal fiction objection, for instance, or the universal salvation objection). Without the proper theological foundation, penal substitution won’t make much sense, and the majority of objections to it grow out of theological systems that clash with it.

The second part of Pierced for Our Transgressions contains responses to specific arguments made against the doctrine of penal substitution. The authors “outline every objection we have been able to find… and respond to each in turn.” I enjoyed this part because I love analyzing arguments and responding to them. You may or may not enjoy it as much as I do, but either way, this section will be a valuable reference when you run into one of the arguments in a book or article—or maybe even from a real person.

What surprised me about the objections to penal substitution was how often they came from misunderstandings or mischaracterizations of the doctrine. This may be because it has been explained poorly (I’ve heard incomplete explanations that could give false impressions.) or, more likely, because it’s downright difficult to see a doctrine with clear eyes when you don’t like it much in the first place. 

Steve Jeffery is a pastor at Holy Trinity, Lyonsdown, in North London.

Michael Ovey is principal of Oak Hill Theological College.

Andrew Sach studied theology at Oak Hill and is now on the staff of St. Helen’s, Bishopgate, in central London.

I’m a little late to the internet review party for Pierced for Our Transgressions, and we all know that timeliness is everything  in this medium. However, I might be the first to recommend it specifically for the primary readers of this blog—women with busy lives who love God’s truth. If your other obligations force you to be choosy about the books you read, put this on your reading list anyway. If you are a believing woman, Christ’s death in your place is the object of your faith, whether you understood it fully when you first believed or not. Christ’s penal substitutionary death is the grounds for the big “Yes” to all the promises of God that you enjoy. It’s the center, the heart, the hinge of your spiritual life. Pierced for Our Transgressions will help you learn it, love it and thank God for it.

---

1From Pierced for Our Transgressions:

The doctrine of penal substitution states that God gave himself in the person of his Son to suffer instead of us the death, punishment and curse due to fallen humanity as the penalty for sin.

Book Review: The World-Tilting Gospel

Embracing a Biblical Worldview & Hanging on Tight by Dan Phillips.

If I were to sum up the message of The World-Tilting Gospel in one sentence, I’d say it explains what it REALLY means to be a Christian. That this task takes 300 pages is a measure, I suppose, of how wrong we’ve got it—and by we’ve, I’m referring to present-day evangelicals.

Too often, says Phillips, modern evangelicals don’t have a biblical worldview. We can’t give a proper explanation of what the gospel is and why it’s needed, and it’s bad teaching that stands in the way.

So what’s the solution?

The greatest need of the church today is a strategic, full-orbed, robust, biblical grasp of the Gospel fo Jesus Christ and its transformative implications. We don’t need more glitz or glamour, better marketing or programs, snazzier decor or entertainment. We do need a whole-Bible grasp of the Gospel. 

That’s what The World-Tilting Gospel gives us: the whole-Bible Gospel in an energetic, easy-to-understand, earnest-but-never-preachy style. 

There’s nothing more important or profound than what this book unfolds for us. The first part is about us and our big problem. As it turns out, our big problem is us. When it comes to our spiritual condition, we are dead. In other words, we “don’t and can’t help ourselves.” Outside help is our only hope.

Click to read more ...